Dear
Editor,
I wish to respond to your comments in regards smoking in pubs.
We
are all aware over the last few years that there has been growing feelings over
smoking in public places, which of course includes public houses.
This
has been underlined by recent ‘banning’ of smoking in part in such liberal
counties as the U.S.A, Canada and more recently Ireland.
The
statistics have also pointed to a large drop in smokers in the U.K. which I
believes points to the percent of smokers in the U.K. is now down to 27%
However
as many non-smokers of us know to enforcing any voluntary ban by creating
non-smoking areas is quite hard to police. Should non-smokers have to pay a
contribution to the potential costs of having to have additional staff to police
non-smoking areas, as well resources for additional cleaning of all areas, as
well as the ashtrays?
So
how can we go forward on this? If I can be brave and mention the word Wetherspoons
I hope I won’t scare too may people away. In an article published in April by
its Chairman, Tim Martin he vindicated a national smoking ban in all licensed
premises. Before smokers start quaking in their boots, let me repeat my Mr
Martin has suggested such a ban.
He
says his company has invested over £60m in 12 months in measures to separate
the well-defined smoking and non-smoking areas in his premises. However with 75%
of the population being non-smokers it is increasing hard to separate such
areas, particularly at such a cost, which clearly both non and smokers are
having to pay for. Mr Martin states that only a national ban would work, he says
it is no good having each local authority (L.A.) creating a total ban, he feels
this would just drive smokers to another L.A. area.